The United Arab Emirates has a defined national policy for digital accessibility, a wider disability rights framework and additional local requirements in Dubai. Together, these measures establish a clear direction: digital government services should be usable by people of determination and senior citizens, and accessibility should be managed through standards, governance, training, testing and continuing improvement.
The position is more detailed than a simple statement that every website in the UAE must meet the same standard. Federal government entities have explicit duties under the National Digital Accessibility Policy. The policy also reaches contractors, service providers and other organisations involved in government digital services. Local authorities and sector regulators may set further requirements. Private companies must therefore assess their services, customers, contracts, sector and location before defining the requirements that apply to them. [2] [3]
For most organisations developing or renewing a public-facing digital service, WCAG 2.2 Level AA is the strongest practical technical target. The national policy expressly names WCAG 2.1 Level AA for public service websites, while the UAE Government platform and the UAE Design System already refer to WCAG 2.2. Meeting a technical standard does not remove the need to check legal, regulatory and contractual obligations. [3] [5] [6] [11]
Legal note This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. Requirements should be confirmed for the organisation, service, sector and jurisdiction concerned.
Federal disability rights law
Federal Law No. 29 of 2006 protects the rights and access to services of people of determination. [4]
It supplies the wider rights context, but it does not by itself provide a complete website testing standard.
National Digital Accessibility Policy
The March 2024 policy sets objectives, scope, governance duties and technical guidance for accessible digital services. [2] [3]
Federal entities have explicit obligations. Suppliers, contractors and organisations connected to government services can also fall within its scope.
Current federal implementation
The UAE Government platform states that it is designed to meet WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 Level AA as a minimum. The UAE Design System follows WCAG 2.2. [5] [6]
New projects should treat WCAG 2.2 Level AA as the forward-looking baseline unless another binding requirement applies.
Dubai legislation and standards
Dubai law recognises access to information and digital platforms. Its implementing bylaw assigns Digital Dubai a role in policies, standards and supervision. [7] [8]
Dubai organisations should check local rules and Digital Dubai requirements as well as the federal framework.
This summary distinguishes rights, policy, technical standards and local implementation. These sources should be read together rather than treated as interchangeable.
The National Digital Accessibility Policy was issued in March 2024 by the UAE Digital Government under the Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority. Its purpose is to support an inclusive society in which people of determination and senior citizens can access digital information and services on an equal basis with other users. [2] [3]
The policy addresses governance as well as technology. It covers the obligations of federal entities, awareness, inclusion, employee training, technical solutions, accessibility of websites and mobile channels, service journeys, accessibility statements, compliance monitoring and the role of a Digital Accessibility Officer.
Its definition of digital accessibility concerns the usability of information and communications technology products, information and services by people of determination and senior citizens with a comparable degree of effectiveness and safety. The policy also uses inclusive design as a governing principle, meaning products and services should be usable by as many people as possible without requiring separate designs. [3]
The scope section begins broadly by addressing services provided digitally in the UAE, then identifies several groups with different levels of responsibility. This distinction is important when an organisation assesses whether a requirement is mandatory, connected to a government relationship or recommended as best practice. [3]
These clauses do not support a single blanket statement that every private website has exactly the same federal compliance duty. They do show that accessibility can reach private organisations through licensing, public service delivery, procurement, contracting and the development of government systems. The policy objective also refers to private sector providers of public services, including areas such as healthcare, education and e-commerce. [3]
The policy gives federal entities operational responsibilities rather than asking them to rely on a general commitment. Key duties include the following. [3]
The Digital Accessibility Officer is expected to coordinate implementation, develop roadmaps, support teams, build capability, monitor compliance and help ensure that accessibility standards are applied to products, applications and equipment developed or acquired by the entity. This makes accessibility a governance function, not only a task for the web development team. [3]
The clearest formal reference appears in the technical annex to the national policy. It states that all public service sites must comply with WCAG 2.1 Level AA. The policy also requires federal accessibility statements to identify the standard applied, naming WCAG 2.1 as a minimum example. [3]
Current government implementation is moving further. The official UAE Government platform states that it is designed and developed to meet WCAG 2.1 and WCAG 2.2 Level AA as a minimum. The UAE Design System says that it adheres to WCAG 2.2 so that its components can be used by people with visual, auditory, cognitive and motor impairments. [5] [6]
WCAG 2.2 Level AA is therefore the better baseline for new or substantially updated services. It includes the Level A and AA requirements inherited from WCAG 2.1 and adds criteria that address current interaction patterns, including focus visibility, dragging movements, target size and accessible authentication. If a contract, tender, regulator or competent authority names WCAG 2.1 or another standard, that requirement must still be followed. [11]
Dubai has an additional local framework. Law No. 3 of 2022 defines accessibility as making information and digital platforms accessible to persons with disabilities in line with adopted standards. It recognises access to information and data platforms in accessible formats as a protected right. [7]
The implementing bylaw requires the concerned entities to ensure accessibility to digital services, information and telecommunications systems through formats suitable for different disabilities. It gives the Dubai Digital Authority responsibility for developing policies and technical standards for digital channels such as websites and smart applications, and for supervising compliance by the public and private sectors in line with priorities and available resources. [8]
This is a stronger local basis for considering private sector responsibilities in Dubai, but the wording still requires careful application. The bylaw does not state that every private website automatically has an identical WCAG conformance obligation. An organisation should identify the applicable Digital Dubai standard, sector requirement, licensing condition, public service role and enforcement context before making a legal claim.
Dubai’s own city portal aims for WCAG 2.1 Level AA and describes internal assessment, external audits, staff training and an accessibility officer as part of its approach. The Dubai Design System also states that its components are designed with WCAG accessibility in mind. [9] [10]
Private companies should not treat accessibility as relevant only to ministries. Several common business relationships can create a direct or practical requirement.
A private company with no government relationship may still have legal, sector, contractual and customer service reasons to prioritise accessibility. The appropriate conclusion is not that accessibility is optional until a complaint occurs. It is that the source and scope of the requirement must be identified accurately.
The national policy addresses digital products and services across several channels. Depending on the service and relationship, an accessibility programme may need to cover the following.
Testing only the home page is therefore insufficient. A service can have accessible navigation while its registration form, identity verification, payment process or downloadable document remains unusable with a keyboard or screen reader.
WCAG Level AA affects design, content, code and interaction. A credible implementation normally includes the following requirements.
Automated scanning can identify some code-level failures, but it cannot judge every user journey or content decision. Manual testing, keyboard testing and testing with assistive technology are needed to determine whether a service works in practice.
UAE services frequently combine Arabic and English. Accessibility must therefore be verified in both languages. A compliant English interface does not prove that the Arabic version has the correct language metadata, reading order, focus sequence or component behaviour.
Testing should cover right-to-left layouts, mixed-language labels, Arabic pronunciation in screen readers, form validation, numbers, dates, menus, carousels and bilingual documents. Teams should also confirm that interface changes made for Arabic have not altered keyboard order or separated visible labels from their programmatic names.
Arabic PDFs require their own review. A document may look correct while its tags, headings, tables and reading order are unusable with assistive technology. Exporting a designed document to PDF is not enough to establish accessibility.
Accessibility tools can offer useful personalisation features such as text resizing, colour adjustments and reading support. They cannot independently establish WCAG conformance or correct every barrier in a product’s code, structure, content and interaction design.
A tool cannot decide whether alternative text conveys the right meaning, repair a broken keyboard interaction, rewrite confusing instructions, create accurate captions or verify that a complete service journey works with a screen reader. An accessibility widget may support users as one part of a wider programme, but remediation and testing must address the underlying product.
It is mandatory in clearly defined contexts, particularly for federal government entities under the National Digital Accessibility Policy. Requirements can also affect suppliers, contractors, public service providers, regulated businesses and organisations covered by local rules or contracts. The exact answer for a private website depends on its service, sector, jurisdiction and relationships.
The national policy’s technical annex explicitly requires WCAG 2.1 Level AA for public service sites. Current federal implementation also refers to WCAG 2.2. For new work, WCAG 2.2 Level AA is the stronger baseline, while any named contractual or regulatory requirement must also be satisfied.
It can. The policy includes several private sector relationships, especially public service delivery, regulated entities, government transactions, contractors and technology suppliers. It also encourages wider local, semi-government and private sector adoption. This does not mean that every private website has an identical duty.
Dubai has its own disability rights law and implementing bylaw. The bylaw requires accessible digital services and gives the Dubai Digital Authority a role in setting technical standards and supervising public and private sector compliance. Organisations in Dubai should review this local framework in addition to federal policy.
No. A widget may provide helpful user controls, but it cannot establish conformance across source code, forms, content, documents and complete interactions. Manual remediation and testing remain necessary.
They may fall directly within the applicable policy, contract or accessibility programme. The UAE policy addresses mobile applications, digital services, forms, content and other interfaces. PDFs and other documents must also be reviewed when they carry essential information or form part of a service journey.
Federal entities are required to publish an accessibility policy or statement. Other organisations should consider doing so when they have tested their services and can describe their standard, limitations, contact channel and improvement process accurately.
Begin with a scoped audit of the most important user journeys and content types. The audit should map findings to the chosen WCAG version, explain their effect on users, distinguish automated results from manually confirmed issues and provide practical remediation guidance.
The UAE has moved beyond general statements of inclusion. The national policy assigns governance, training, reporting and technical responsibilities to federal entities. Current government platforms and design systems show a shift from WCAG 2.1 towards WCAG 2.2, while Dubai legislation gives digital accessibility an additional local basis.
For organisations, the practical response is to identify the exact requirements that apply, adopt WCAG 2.2 Level AA as the technical baseline for new work, test real user journeys and maintain evidence of remediation. This approach supports compliance, procurement readiness and better access for customers and employees.
VisiAble helps organisations evaluate and improve the accessibility of websites, applications and digital content. Our services combine expert WCAG review, manual testing, keyboard testing, assistive technology testing, remediation guidance and conformance documentation.
Not sure where your digital platform stands? Request a professional accessibility audit from VisiAble.